[tamil.net] Dilbert & Power Communications (fw)


To tamil@tamil.net
From Bala Pillai <bala@tamil.net>
Date Sun, 10 Jan 1999 07:45:27 +1100
Delivered-To listarc@chennai.apic.net

________________________________________________

-WANTED: Distributors for Refurbished Pentium 75s
-complete unit; ex-bank stock; 200 units @ US$325 each
-Regular supply from Australia. Email lyn@sydney.net

-The Thamil Innaiyam Community is mainly funded by
-The Asia Pacific Internet Company <info@apic.net>
-_______________________________________________


http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/ideasatwork/adams.html#iv4i3-94-idea94


                 Hypnosis, Dilbert, and Animal Metaphors
                 Scott Adams on the Art of Communication
                 (Harvard Communications Update January 1999)

                                            

                 Scott Adams’s syndicated comic strip, Dilbert, runs
                 in more than 1,700 newspapers in more than 50
                 countries. He’s written several best sellers, including
                 The Dilbert Principle. Every “cube farm” in the
                 business world today has at least one Dilbert cartoon
                 on its walls. Adams’s deft depiction of workplace
                 absurdities has rung so true with business people that
                 his work has evolved into idiom: When supervisors
                 annoy or demean employees, they are now said to be
                 “Dilberting” them. Beneath the facade of a droll
                 workplace wit and an accidental artist, Adams is a
                 shrewd analyst of business communications. HCU
                 went to him for insights into how he does it. Can we all
                 learn to communicate with the punch of a Dilbert
                 cartoon?

                 HCU: In the Dilbert strip, you have to make points
                 vividly in limited space. How does this apply to other
                 forms of communication? 

                 Adams: Oddly enough, the most useful thing that I did
                 for learning the craft of cartooning was to take a
                 business-writing course. And unlike any writing
                 courses you might take in college where they tell you
                 to throw in those adjectives and pile on the adverbs,
                 the goal in the course was to keep subtracting. You
                 just make sure that the one thing you want to say is all
                 that’s left. That actually was a turning point in my
                 cartoon career. So I think the one tip I would give is
                 never underestimate the inability of the human mind to
                 process communications. The brain only takes in one
                 thing out of ten, so you might as well throw away the
                 other nine.

                 HCU: Even when we’re reading?

                 Adams: Even when people are reading, the amount
                 they actually absorb is a very tiny percent. If you were
                 to say, for example, “Mark McGwire hit a crushing
                 home run into the right field fence. It was number 61.”
                 All anybody remembers is “McGwire home run.”
                 When I write cartoons, I just hit them with the facts,
                 without the adjectives, and it leaves the impression that
                 more information is being transferred, oddly enough,
                 because it doesn’t get filtered. The fewer words you
                 use, the better off you are.

                 HCU: Is business jargon now the greatest threat to the
                 English language?

                 Adams: People don’t bring that language home too
                 much. You know, you come home and you’re not
                 really facilitating the diapers. For some reason people
                 can turn it on and off...I think it’s a surrogate for
                 actually being confident. It probably took me 10 years
                 of working in the corporate world before I realized that
                 it wasn’t just because I was inexperienced that I was
                 confused, but it was because everybody’s full of [it].
                 Soon I realized that I was bluffing, too. Everybody’s
                 bluffing. If you can say, “Well, we are going to do a
                 paradigm here. We’re looking at different models.
                 We’ll run a few simulations and put this together to see
                 if we can get a consensus.” That sounds much better
                 than, “I don’t know.”

                 HCU: In The Dilbert Principle, you write that “the
                 purpose of a presentation is to transfer resources away
                 from accomplishing objectives and to concentrate
                 them on explaining how well you’re doing.” Should
                 companies have separate meetings for this kind of
                 breast-beating? 

                 Adams: I’m actually working on a different method
                 now. I’m recommending that we solve meeting
                 problems by creating chairs that actually heat up about
                 10 degrees for every minute that you talk; they’re
                 voice-activated. So on a cool winter day, if you can
                 say your point in a minute or two, you’ll get a nice
                 warm chair. You’ll be happy about that. But if you
                 keep rambling on like many people do, you’ll actually
                 be incinerated.

                 The worst kinds of people are the ones who use
                 meetings as a surrogate for a social life. If you notice
                 anybody who’s really pushing to schedule a meeting
                 either after six o’clock at night or on a weekend, these
                 are people who are not dating or who hate their
                 families.

                 HCU: Your prescription for writing humor includes six
                 elements: cute, bizarre, mean, naughty, clever, and
                 recognizable, and you’ve said that the writer needs to
                 use at least two of the six to be funny. How did you
                 come up with this?

                 Adams: I was just thinking: How is it that some things
                 are funny and some aren’t? So I just started paying
                 attention and making a note of the elements that I saw
                 in humor, and when I got to six, I didn’t find any
                 more. I noticed that for something to be funny, you
                 need to have at least two of the six.

                 HCU: You often use animal metaphors and analogies:
                 faster than a cheetah leaving a salad bar, deader than a
                 fish stick at a cat festival. Do animal analogies help you
                 achieve two of the six elements of humor?

                 Adams: Yes: they’re automatic — part of the reason
                 for Gary Larson’s success, I think. He was really the
                 first one to figure out that as soon as you put an animal
                 into a situation and had it act in any human way, it was
                 automatically bizarre — and often cute, because
                 people like animals.

                 HCU: You write frequently of the various uses of
                 e-mail. What won’t you use e-mail for?

                 Adams: You’re asking the wrong guy. I heavily favor
                 e-mail over all other forms of communication.

                 HCU: In The Joy of Work, you discussed using a
                 white board, not paper, because it’s an evanescent
                 medium that precludes the possibility of error — or
                 accountability — after being erased. Has this idea
                 spurred white board sales?

                 Adams: It can’t hurt at all. But I believe it’s more
                 basic than that. I think it has to do with the fact that
                 after 10 billion years of evolution we’ve only had a few
                 hundred years of any serious technology, and really
                 we’re the same people who lived in caves and wrote
                 on the wall. So we feel comfortable doing that.

                 Here we are, stuck in these cubicles which essentially
                 recreate the caves that we loved so much, but we
                 don’t have any good way to write on the wall. Hence
                 the white board. I think soon you’ll also see portable
                 heaters for cubicles to replace the fire in front of the
                 cave. It’s a slightly improved version of the cave, but
                 only in the detail.

                 HCU: You’ve written that you hypnotize people at
                 meetings so they’ll agree with you. Is that an
                 exaggeration?

                 Adams: No, that’s actually something that I have done
                 and continue to do...If somebody at a meeting crosses
                 their arms in a certain way, they’ll influence other
                 people to do the same. If somebody yawns, other
                 people yawn. People follow each other’s leads. They
                 don’t think about it; they just feel comfortable doing it.
                 And this is a very small part of the overall benefit of
                 hypnosis.

                 The real benefit is that it helps us understand the
                 conscious mind.... For example, there are radio
                 commercials that simulate the sound of a dentist’s drill.
                 But it’s not about dentistry, it’s just that they’re trying
                 to be funny and they’re selling cars or whatever it is.
                 Now, the people who do not have hypnosis training
                 think this is great, it’s funny, and everybody can relate
                 to that dental feeling. They know it’s not really going
                 to hurt them because it’s not real; it’s just a
                 commercial. But after you’ve studied hypnosis you
                 know that if you put two images in somebody’s mind
                 at the same time, one is hideous pain, and two is —
                 Hey, how about buying this Buick? — you will sell a
                 whole lot fewer Buicks.

                 HCU: So if you’re trying to sell an idea, you’d best
                 conjure up positive, pleasurable images?

                 Adams: Right. People forget the words, but they’ll
                 remember the picture.... If you’re trying to get
                 someone to agree with your point of view, for
                 example, hypnosis teaches you that you want to give
                 them the ability to imagine the things they want to while
                 making sure they don’t have something to disagree
                 with. Trial lawyers use this well.

                 The hypnotic analogue is that if you’re hypnotizing
                 somebody and their eyes are closed and you say,
                 “Imagine yourself walking through the forest. A
                 beautiful forest, feeling really good,” you kind of bring
                 them into it.... But if you then say, “And you see a
                 tree, a walnut tree,” you’ve lost them. The reason is,
                 when you say, “And you see a tree,” everybody
                 imagines the kind of tree they like best. Maybe it’s a
                 spruce tree.

                 HCU: How does the Dilbert strip reflect this?

                 Adams: The comment I get most from readers is:
                 “Dilbert must work in my company.” And it’s not
                 because I said he did. It’s because I removed all the
                 clues that would have [indicated] he didn’t. By taking
                 away their ability to find an objection, I allow them to
                 find the thing that they like best. The key to
                 communication is to try to get as little of it as possible,
                 especially from your boss and coworkers....

                 I know someone who’s got a boss who doesn’t
                 answer voice mail and turns off his e-mail. And he
                 spends almost all of his time out of the office and has
                 no pager. So he can reach you, but only when he
                 wants something.

                 When I first heard this I thought: man, what a nut! It’s
                 obviously not going to last. But I found out that he
                 was very successful because this caused people to
                 solve their own problems. The few minutes that he
                 would show up, he would give directions and then he
                 would get completely out of the way. By eliminating all
                 communications in one direction, he was actually very
                 effective.

                 HCU: What was he doing with his time?

                 Adams: Nobody knows.

bala pillai* bala@sydney.net*the asia pacific internet co, sydney
O N L I N E   R O C K E T - F U E L E D   C O M M U N I T I E S
<http://apic.net>   <http://sydney2000.net> <http://malaysia.net>
<http://tamil.net>      for info send blank <mailto:info@apic.net>
ph:+61 2 9419 5333                         fax: + 61 2 9419 5155


________________________________________________

To unsubscribe: send an email to majordomo@tamil.net with
text 'unsubscribe tamil' (without quotes) in the body of the message.

Become a good netizen: to learn netiquette send a blank email to
the autoresponder, netiquette@tamil.net
For subscribe and FAQ send blank email to info@tamil.net
________________________________________________